The first thing that seemed to be important was to get clearly in my mind my own conception of Freemasonry.
What was it?
Was it merely a meeting of friends at a drama club or a study circle held in what one might almost call a quasi-religious atmosphere; or was it a philosophy, something that was part of oneself, something that influenced one’s actions in the ordinary daily life?
Was it a way of living, or just a habit which appealed to the ego and which gave a feeling of smugness towards one’s fellowmen, particularly towards those who were not fortunate enough to enjoy its “privileges”?
Did it foster the desire to devote oneself to a better way of life, or did it only foster selfishness, a feeling of irritation such as might be experienced when something prevents attendance at the Lodge meeting?
Was there any relationship between Freemasonry and its members, or was it only between brother and brother?
Title
1952 - IS FREEMASONRY REALLY WORTHWHILE? - Bro. L. D. T. Smith.
